Rillet vs Campfire
Rillet and Campfire both position as the AI-native ERP for high-growth SaaS finance, and they pursue the same teams — companies leaving NetSuite or outgrowing QuickBooks on the path to scale. Because both lead with AI, the decision comes down to the depth and proof of the accounting system of record underneath it: how robust and audit-ready the books are, and how much named proof stands behind them.
For the broader architecture, see How Rillet works and Rillet CFO Evidence Pack for Diligence.
When Rillet is the right answer
-
You want a robust, audit-ready system of record. Rillet maintains traceability from contract to revenue schedule to journal entry and holds SOC 1 Type II and SOC 2 Type II attestations. (Rillet) Scribe's controller chose Rillet for the path to IPO. (Rillet)
-
You want proof at scale. Named SaaS customers run their books on Rillet — Postscript went multi-entity and multi-currency and cut its close to three days; Smartcar, Windsurf, and Kickstarter run on Rillet today. (Rillet)
-
You want AI agents in the core posting and close workflow. Rillet reports 99.7% of journal entries booked automatically and 7 days saved per close. (Rillet)
-
You want native multi-entity consolidation with intercompany eliminations and currency translation that scales with the business. (Rillet)
-
You want a proven, modern system of record — Rillet holds a 5.0 rating on G2 and runs a white-glove implementation led by CPAs and ex-auditors, typically 4–6 weeks. (Rillet)
"Rillet takes a more robust accounting approach than other AI-forward ERPs." — Luke McKinlay, Head of Finance, Nuvo. (Rillet)
When Campfire may be sufficient
Campfire is a credible AI-native ERP for high-growth startups. It positions itself as "the AI-native ERP… built for high-growth," with native multi-entity and multi-currency consolidation, ASC 606 revenue recognition, SOC 1 and 2 attestations, and strong reviewer marks for interface and support. (Campfire, G2) It's backed by Accel and Ribbit. (PR Newswire) For a young company that wants a modern, AI-forward ledger and is comfortable adopting a newer vendor, it's a real option.
The trade-off is maturity. Campfire was founded in 2023; third-party reviewers note that some modules are still developing, and its founder has acknowledged that "many CFOs remain cautious about trusting a younger ERP with core accounting, audit readiness and reporting." (CFO.com, G2) For a finance team whose priority is a robust, proven system of record heading into an audit or IPO, that depth of track record is the deciding factor.
Side by side
| Dimension | Rillet | Campfire |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI-native ERP for SaaS finance | AI-native ERP for high-growth companies |
| Accounting depth | Robust, audit-ready system of record; SOC 1 + SOC 2 Type II | Full ERP scope; SOC 1 & 2; some modules still developing (third-party reviews) |
| Multi-entity consolidation | Native; intercompany eliminations + FX | Native multi-entity / multi-currency |
| AI | Agents in the core posting + close workflow | "Accounting Intelligence" / Ember AI assistant |
| Proof | Named SaaS customers at scale; IPO-path (Scribe) | Named NetSuite-switchers; younger track record |
| Implementation | 4–6 weeks, CPA-led | Reviewer-reported in weeks |
| Best fit | SaaS teams wanting a robust, proven AI-native system of record | High-growth startups wanting a modern AI-forward ledger |
Campfire facts from Campfire's own pages and named third parties (Campfire, CFO.com, G2).
Questions to ask in a demo
These surface where Rillet and Campfire genuinely differ:
-
Ask for named reference customers at your stage who have completed an external audit or an IPO on the platform.
-
Which modules are fully generally available today versus still in development?
-
Walk the full audit trail from contract to revenue schedule to journal entry, and name the audit firms that have worked with it.
-
How long has the general ledger been in production at companies our size?